Shop Edmonds Elements for Unique Educational Resources, Toys and Games

Fill out your e-mail address
to receive our newsletter!
Hosting by YMLP.com
You don't want to miss The NobleEd News Webzine You'll find website recommendations, educational freebies, featured articles and contest and scholarship information.

Click here to read the latest edition

 

 

Home ] About this Site ] Privacy Statement ] Internet Use Contract ] NobleEd News Award ] News ] Book Store ] Site Contents ] Recognition ] Teacher Center ] Parent Center ] Student Center ] Career and Education Articles ] Greeting Card Center ] Music Center ] Art Gallery ] National Geographic Posters ] Technology Center ] Computer Store ] Games ] Link to Us ] NobleEd News Email ] NobleEd Newsletter ]

Teacher Store ] Multicultural Classroom ] Lesson Plan Links ] Teaching Strategies ] Learning Styles ] Group Learning Styles ] [ What is the Theory of Multiple Intelligences ] Classroom Management ] Language Arts ] Teaching Tolerance ] Staff Lounge ] Teacher Center News ] Science Lessons ] Math Lessons ] Social Studies Lessons ]

What is the Theory of Multiple Intelligences?

Be sure to check out our Teacher Center Home

Part 1: Biological Basis

 

Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences is based

on the premise that each individual's intelligence is composed of multiple "intelligences," each of which has its own independent operating system within the brain. These intelligences include: verbal-linguistic, logical-mathematical, spatial, bodily-kinesthetic, musical, interpersonal, intrapersonal, and naturalist.

 

The verbal-linguistic intelligence is the use of both written and spoken language for the purpose of communication. Those possessing the verbal-linguistic intelligence are sensitive to the meanings, sounds, and rhythms of words. They love reading, poetry, tongue twisters, puns, humor, puzzles, and riddles.

 

The logical-mathematical intelligence is the use of abstract

relationships presented in terms of either numbers or symbols. It also includes the use of logic and analysis in the sense of logically organizing an essay or analyzing poetry. Those possessing the logical-mathematical intelligence enjoy number games, problem solving, pattern games, and experimenting. They also do well with writing that involves exposition, argumentation, definition, classification, and analysis.

 

The spatial intelligence is the manipulation of objects within a given space, whether that space is the size of a piece of paper, a room, a building, or a town. Those possessing the spatial intelligence respond to visual cues and they like to invent and design.

 

The bodily-kinesthetic intelligence is the ability to use the body effectively to solve problems. Those possessing the bodily-kinesthetic intelligence enjoy dramatics, role-playing, dancing, and physical _expression.

 

The musical intelligence is the ability to make use of the relationship between pitch, rhythm, and timbre. Those

possessing the musical intelligence enjoy playing instruments, singing, and drumming, and they like the sounds of the human voice, environmental sounds, and instrumental sounds. It has been described as hearing patterns.

 

The interpersonal intelligence is the ability to understand the thoughts, beliefs, and intents of others and the ability to respond appropriately. Those possessing the interpersonal intelligence are social and are in tune with the feelings of others. They make excellent leaders, can help their peers and work cooperatively with others.

 

The intrapersonal intelligence is a sense of self-awareness used to guide individual behavior. Those possessing the intrapersonal intelligence like to work independently. They are self-motivated and self-aware.

 

The naturalist intelligence is an understanding of the natural world and the ability to use that understanding productively. Those possessing the naturalist intelligence can recognize and classify elements from the natural world (e.g. farming or biological science).

 

The exact combination of intelligences varies from person to person. For example, one person might be strong in the verbal-linguistic and interpersonal intelligences with secondary strengths in the intrapersonal, spatial, and musical intelligences and weaknesses in the logical-mathematical, bodily-kinesthetic, and naturalist intelligences. Another person could have an entirely different combination of intelligences. Each person's makeup of intelligences is very similar to DNA; no one has exactly the same combination of intelligences.

 

Gardner's criteria for selecting these particular abilities as intelligences include: independence from other intelligences (within the brain); having a central set of information-processing operations; having a distinct developmental history; having roots in evolutionary history; and having a cultural basis. When Gardner says that intelligences are independent, he is referring to separate sections of the brain that control each intelligence and have distinct methods of processing information. According to an article by Tina Blythe and Gardner, each intelligence has its own "distinct mode of thinking."

 

Gardner's research with brain-injured adults and with autistic children has indicated that the human brain has separate areas that control separate functions. For example, Gardner described a woman who suffered a brain injury and lost the ability to speak, yet she maintained her ability to sing. This example shows that the verbal-linguistic intelligence functions separately from the musical intelligence.

 

Gardner makes a distinction between the isolation of each

intelligence within the structure of the human brain and the

isolation of the intelligences when called upon to complete real-world operations. Intelligences do not work independently of one another in a real-world setting.  According to the theory, most tasks require the simultaneous use of several intelligences in order to be completed successfully. Bruce Torff offers the example of a chess player who must use logic and spatial skills to plan ahead and figure out moves and must also use interpersonal skills to figure out the opponent's defense and plan of action. The intelligences are separate entities which operate in conjunction with each other to create the whole of each individual's ability.

 

Learn more about the multiple Intelligences --

http://www.TheWritingTutor.biz/articles/MI-intro-prob.php  
 
References
 
Armstrong, T. (1994). Multiple intelligences: Seven ways to approach curriculum. Expanded Academic ASAP [on-line
database]. Original Publication: Educational Leadership, 52
(3).
 
Blythe, T., & Gardner, H. (1990). A school for all
intelligences. Educational Leadership, 47 (7), 33-37.
 
Campbell, L., Campbell, B., & Dickinson, D. (1992). Teaching and learning through multiple intelligences. Stanwood, WA: New Horizons for Learning.
 
Checkley, K. (1997). The first seven ... and the eighth: A
conversation with Howard Gardner. Expanded Academic ASAP [on-line database]. Original Publication: Education, 116.
 
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple
intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
 
Gardner, H. (1995a). Multiple intelligences as a catalyst.
English Journal, 84 (8), 16-18.
 
Gardner, H. (1995b). Reflections on multiple intelligences:
Myths and messages. Expanded Academic ASAP [on-line
database]. Original Publication: Phi Delta Kappan, 77 (3).
 
Gardner, H., & Hatch, T. (1990). Multiple intelligences go to school: Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences (Tech. Rep. No. 4). New York: Center for Technology in Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 324 366).
 
Gray, J. H., & Viens, J. T. (1994). The theory of multiple
intelligences: Understanding cognitive diversity in school.
Expanded Academic ASAP [on-line database]. Original
Publication: National Forum, 74 (1).
 
Meyer, M. (1997). The GREENing of learning: using the eighth intelligence. Wilson Select [on-line database]. Original Publication: Educational Leadership, 55.
 
Moll, A. (n.d.). Kentucky Department of Education. Multiple intelligences self profile [WWW]. URL:
www.kde.state.ky.us/MI/misurvey.html  (Accessed September 29, 1998).
 
Reiff, J. C. (1996). Bridging home and school through multiple intelligences. Expanded Academic ASAP [on-line database]. Original Publication: Childhood Education, 72 (3).
 
Smagorinsky, P. (1991). Expressions: Multiple intelligences in the English class. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
 
Smagorinsky, P. (1995b). Multiple intelligences in the
English class: An overview. English Journal, 84 (8), 19-26.
 
Torff, B. (1996). How are you smart?: Multiple intelligences
and classroom practices. The NAMTA Journal, 21 (2), 31-43.
   
Michele R. Acosta is a writer, a former English teacher, and the mother of three boys. She spends her time writing and teaching others to write. Visit http://www.TheWritingTutor.biz/articles   for more articles,
http://www.TheWritingTutor.biz/writing_editing_service  for
professional writing and editing services, or
http://www.TheWritingTutor.biz   for writing and educational resources for young authors, teachers, and parents.
Copyright (c) 2004-2005 The Writing Tutor & Michele R. Acosta. All rights reserved.

 

Critical Thinking for Multiple Learning Styles

Critical Thinking for Multiple Learning Styles

Every classroom is made up of students who have different learning styles. Critical Thinking for Multiple Learning Styles is designed to help teachers connect with each and every student:

 

  • Word Players love to read and write. They're at home in the library, and games like Scrabble and Taboo appeal to them.
  • Questioners excel in math and science classes. They like to analyze and look for patterns, and their personal heroes are people like Bill Gates or Marie Curie.
  • Visualizers are drawn to images and colors. They create cartoons and invent unusual gadgets.
  • Movers enjoy physical activities. Games, skits, and demonstrations are the types of activities that appeal to them. Hands-on learning works well with movers.
  • Naturalists view the world around them as their classroom. They are fascinated by plants and animals and outer space. They are natural observers.
  • Music Lovers' worlds revolve around music and dance. Mnemonics prove useful to them when it comes to memorization.
  • Socializers thrive on social contact. Collaboration and communication are the keys. Activities such as interviews, debates, and simulations really tap into their learning strengths.
  • Individualists tend to be self-motivated thinkers. They prefer self-assessment projects, and they flourish with computer work and essays.

Critical Thinking for Multiple Learning Styles offers a multitude of lessons and activities that address the specific needs of each of these types of learners. Warm-up activities prime students for learning, and brain puzzlers keep them thinking creatively. Higher-order-thinking (HOT) strategies are stressed, as lessons focus on hands-on learning, collaboration, and real-life problem solving and decision making.

To Purchase Click below

Critical Thinking for Multiple Learning Styles

Part 2: Cultural Influence

Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences developed as he worked with brain injured adults and autistic children. He identified distinct portions of the brain that control specific human abilities or talents like analysis, classification, speech, self-awareness, etc. He has identified eight distinct abilities that he refers to as "intelligences": verbal-linguistic, logical-mathematical, spatial, bodily-kinesthetic, musical, interpersonal, intrapersonal, and the naturalist. In addition to the biological basis for these intelligences, Gardner also places great emphasis on cultural influences that may impact the development of each intelligence.

Culture determines what parents and schools will teach their children based on the needs of the community. Gardner says: "It is the culture that defines the stages and fixes the limits of individual achievement." For example, educators have found that the Mexican American culture places a strong emphasis on community and on family; therefore, many members of this community have well-developed interpersonal intelligences.

The influence culture has on the development of the intelligences points to one of the most important components of the theory -- the makeup of intelligences changes over time with age and with experience. Thomas Hatch profiled the intelligences of several children when they were in kindergarten and again when they were in the sixth grade. He discovered that their intelligence profiles had changed over time. Hatch says: "Just because young children display particular capacities does not necessarily mean that they will grow up to excel in activities involving those capacities. Children's intelligences, the manner in which they display them, and how successful they are, shift, grow, and vary over time."

In other words, if intelligences change with time and experience, they can be learned. If they can be learned, they can be taught. As a result, students who are not strong in one intelligence can be taught to develop that intelligence. According to Bruce Torff: "The intelligences develop - they grow and change over time, which allows strengths to be exploited and weaker areas remedied. ...If you provide the right kinds of support for students, they build the kinds of intellectual structures that enable them to do things."

David Lazear says that teachers should watch for "ways to help students stretch into new intellectual areas – maybe areas in which they are uncomfortable or weak." Not only are weaker areas strengthened, but students develop a better self-image because they use a well developed intelligence to improve a weaker one.

In an interview with Kathy Checkley, Gardner said: "Teachers have to help students use their combination of intelligences to be successful in school, to help them learn whatever it is they want to learn, as well as what the teachers and society believe they have to learn." In other words, Gardner believes that teachers need to find ways to incorporate instruction into their classrooms that encourages students to develop weaker intelligences by drawing on their strengths. This in turn improves both attitude toward learning and academic achievement.


Learn more about the multiple Intelligences --  http://www.TheWritingTutor.biz/articles/MI-intro-prob.php 

References:

Checkley, K. (1997). The first seven ... and the eighth: A conversation with Howard Gardner. Expanded Academic ASAP [on-line database]. Original Publication: Education, 116.

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

Hatch, T. (1997b). Getting specific about multiple
intelligences. Expanded Academic ASAP [on-line database]. Original Publication: Educational Leadership, 54 (6).

Lazear, D. G. (1994). Multiple intelligences approaches to assessment: Solving the assessment conundrum. Tucson, AZ: Zephyr Press.

Torff, B. (1996). How are you smart?: Multiple intelligences and classroom practices. The NAMTA Journal, 21 (2), 31-43.

Vasquez, J. A. (1990). Teaching to the distinctive traits of minority students. The Clearing House, 63, 299-304.

Michele R. Acosta is a freelance writer, a former English teacher, and the mother of three boys. She spends her time writing and teaching others to write. Visit http://www.TheWritingTutor.biz/articles  for more articles, http://www.TheWritingTutor.biz/writing_editing_service   for professional writing and editing services, or
http://www.TheWritingTutor.biz  for writing and educational resources for young authors, teachers, and parents.  Copyright (c) 2004-2005 The Writing Tutor & Michele R.  Acosta. All rights reserved.